![]() And why would they even try unless it was of some value?īut I agree with Marty's unspoken skepticism on whether there really are these legal watermark wranglings taking place, I can't find any actual cases. But if defense attorneys often object, then it means that prosecutors attempt to use it even more often. It doesn't mean anything to Grant, but does it mean anything to the court? At first blush one might be tempted to say no, since he claims defense attorneys are objecting all the time (and presumably prevailing some of the time) to watermarking. Defense attorneys can and often object to the authenticity of manufacturer watermarking, even if it is digital Watermarking really doesn't mean a thing to us. Using forensic tools we can extract the native files without ever having to go through watermarking or the encryption process.Īpoarently Grant has never heard of camera-side digital watermarking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |